Rethinking Work and Non-Work in the Recession

For over the last 18 months, the Center for Working-Class Studies has been publishing the “De Facto Unemployment Rate” (DFUR).  The DFUR includes all those who are officially unemployed, those looking for work, the underemployed, disabled or in early retirement, and those receiving government work subsides.  It also estimates those who are in prison or have joined the military because they can’t find work in the private sector. The most recent analysis estimates that the DFUR continues to hover around 30%.

At first, the DFUR did not receive much attention, perhaps because it differs from the typically reported unemployment rate.  But in the last six months, it has been featured in the Manufacturing and Technology News and the Wall Street Journal. More important, the idea of understanding unemployment in broader terms has gained more acceptance as the media has begun to use the Bureau of Labor Statistics’s (BLS) alternative measures of labor underutilization.

In terms of actual job growth, the most recent study by the BLS indicates that almost all employment growth in last six months is due to government jobs, specifically jobs with the U.S. Census. While some have argued that the recession may be over, the lack of private sector job growth indicates that we may be on the brink of another jobless recovery. If the U.S. is to avoid falling back into recession, we must continue to extend unemployment benefits and/or craft another stimulus package.

Yet recent bills to create additional jobs and extend unemployment benefits have met with resistance, and even when such benefits exist, many states make it difficult for those who are out of work to receive any benefits. For example, some states limit benefits for part-timers and those who leave a job for medical reasons or due to the lack of available childcare. A recent study by Economic Policy Institute indicates that less than 67% of the long-term unemployed are receiving benefits.  If unemployment benefits had not been extended, only 35% would have been covered.

The high, persistent unemployment rate suggests a long and very slow economic recovery, and we may, in fact, be entering a “jobless era,” as Don Peck wrote in The Atlantic in March.  But having a job in the current economy doesn’t necessarily protect workers in this recession.  As Jamie Smith Hopkins reported in last week’s Baltimore Sun, 13 percent of employers cut salaries last year, and for many of those workers, their earnings levels may never recover.

But the problems go beyond earnings.  Not only do many workers feel anxiety about keeping their jobs, the quality of work is declining.  The effects of the recession are being exacerbated by changes in the labor market and organization practices based in economic globalization. Trade liberalization, deregulation, privatization, and reduced welfare programs have led to social and economic insecurity, income inequality, weaker unions, reductions in public sector services, and geographical shifts that have resulted in downsizing, restructuring, irregular work hours, electronic monitoring, and the intensification of work.  In turn, these changes have increased job demands, work hours, job insecurity, and control while reducing rewards and social supports making work more precarious.  All of this not only contributes to unemployment in the U.S., it also contributes to work-related stress for those who are still working, as Paul Landsbergis of the Center for Social Epidemiology argued in a recent presentation at the How Class Works Conference.

Increasing levels of job-related stress threaten the health of those who are employed. Landsbergis suggested that while the dramatic deaths and illnesses associated with the “accidents” at the Massy coal mine and BP’s off-shore oil rig get national attention, the insidious influence of job stress increases cardiovascular disease, sickness absence, and acute injuries.  Psychological and musculoskeletal disorders remain under reported, especially among the working class.

Taken together, the DFUR and the impact of economic change on the workplace remind us of the widespread effects of global and national economic trends. We need to think about both the effects of unemployment and the relationship between current economic policies, work practices, individuals, and health in the modern economy. Globalization doesn’t have to cause unemployment or undermine the quality of work.  Government, business, and labor leaders should not wait for an economic recovery to reconsider the impact of globalization on both work and non-work.  Any future economic recovery will be more stable and effective if it not only creates new jobs but also places value on what the International Labor Organization calls decent work for all working people.

John Russo, Center for Working-Class Studies

This entry was posted in Contributors, Issues, John Russo, The Working Class and the Economy and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Rethinking Work and Non-Work in the Recession

  1. Molly says:

    I heard someone else say (and I completely agree) there is plenty of work for everyone to do; the problem is– it’s just not all paid work. I believe somebody or group can begin to create solutions that improve the quality of lives of people in general by addressing work/nonwork issues. I do not believe that it is necessary for the standard of living I currently enjoy to worsen to due our complex economic state.


  2. Bennett Steury says:

    The job stress you describe that US workers are exposed to reminds me of what is going on right now in China over working conditions. Workers in places like Foxconn in Shenzhen have resorted to jumping off the roof at work because they feel they have no recourse for what sounds like indentured servitude. Too bad ILO standards are voluntary and globally unenforced. Then all workers could have decent work.


  3. Kitty says:

    Good work, John. Recognizing the real unemployment rate & its effects on the well-being of the working class is long overdue. As a side note, my nephew is a “rigger” — he disassembles mechanical plants for shipping (usually to China) where they are reassembled. He used to be a tool & die worker.

    He now works primarily in Ohio taking down machinary. According to his boss, it will take another 20 years to ship all the plants to China. His boss, who has traveled to China for the reassembly, says the Chinese workers hang by ropes on the side of the ship to unpack the machinary. He also said it happens that they hit the side of the ship on the ropes the wrong way & die, which is no big deal.

    No need to tell you that the way we are treating immigrant workers & the way Chinese workers are treated affects how all workers are treated.

    Columbus & the legislators have decided to build a casino on the site of the former UAW-GM manufacturing plant. It is almost as if we have lost even the imagination of what it means to create things. Only one person, at the public meeting on the casino, said we needed to be making things rather than building casinos.


  4. Pingback: Rethinking Work and Non-Work in the Recession « Working-Class … | Working Gloves

  5. Dale Maharidge says:

    I once again just completed a cross-country driving trip yesterday and while not formally working as a journalist this time, I informally talked with workers I ran into–hotel clerks, fast food employees, etc. There is a stunning amount of anxiety among working class people. You can see it in their eyes before you even talk with them. The sources you cite, John, are spot-on. In Cleveland, I stopped in at my father’s old shop, a tool & cutter grinding business. The guy who bought it reports business has fallen off the cliff. It’s not part of the usual past cycle of recession when work would pick up during a “recovery.” He told me a lot of the tool & die shops that he does work for are closing. The work is being jobbed overseas. He told me he’d close the business, but that he earns marginally more than he would at a menial job. My father’s business is essentially gone. The man who bought it is a part time worker. –Dale Maharidge


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s