The House is on Fire

A few weeks ago, Charlie Rose facilitated a discussion about the perils of the U.S. national debt among a thoughtful, articulate group of one politician, two businessmen, and two economists.  Except for a brief discussion of the bond market, I was able to understand the various points of view about how menacing the projected growth of the debt is and the various things we might do about it.  Though tilted toward business-class conservatism, Nobel economist Paul Krugman ably presented a progressive view, and I found the conservatives thoughtful and sensible.

I came away from this discussion among what Rose likes to call “the smart people” convinced that we must address our ballooning debt sometime in the next decade or so.  I also came away wondering why the smart people are not devoting similar attention to the President’s budget projections that unemployment will remain around 10% (using the official rate) the rest of this year and not drop by much after that.  It strikes me that this is like carefully discussing cracks in the foundation while the house is on fire.

It’s not that the panelists were indifferent to unemployment.  Continuing high unemployment is one of the major contributors to our growing national debt.  When people are out of work, they don’t pay income taxes, reducing government revenues, and they don’t pay Social Security and Medicare taxes, bringing those entitlement programs’ long-term fiscal problems at us sooner rather than later.  Likewise, nobody in this group, not even the guy from the often shrilly conservative Peterson Institute, spoke against the need to increase social-safety-net spending such as unemployment insurance and food stamps in order to reduce some of the suffering among the unemployed.

But while not indifferent to unemployment, they conveyed no sense of emergency.  They didn’t seem to realize that the house is actually on fire and even if the fire is not spreading as dramatically as it was last year at this time, letting it smolder indefinitely will eventually destroy the house, even if it doesn’t reignite and burn the house to the ground.

This is why a recent story in The Atlantic, “How a New Jobless Era Will Transform America,” is so important.  Though much of the information and analysis in the article will not be new to readers of Working-Class Perspectives, it reaches the right audience: Charlie Rose’s “smart people.”  The author, deputy managing editor Don Peck, is a certifiably smart person himself who writes in a clear, compelling but relatively understated way.  The article has already gained a lot of attention among leading opinion-makers and, therefore, has a shot at generating a sense of urgency about what Peck very convincingly shows is “a slow motion social catastrophe.”

Peck is not predicting a second dip to the Great Recession.  He simply accepts White House projections of persistently high joblessness as the economy keeps “recovering.” Rather, he explains what social science investigation over the past half-century shows about the devastating long-term consequences of such sustained unemployment – its impact on individuals (even after they go back to work), on families, communities, and the nation as a whole, even the majority of those who stay employed through it all:

The Great Recession may be over, but this era of high joblessness is probably just  beginning.  Before it ends, it will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults. It will leave an indelible imprint on many blue-collar men. It could cripple marriage as an institution in many communities. It may already be plunging many inner cities into a despair not seen for decades.   Ultimately, it is likely to warp our politics, our culture, and the character of our society for years to come.

The article is all the more effective, in my view, because it does not lay out its own or report others’ strategies for reducing unemployment.  Instead, Peck focuses on convincing us of the depth, extent, and urgency of the problem.  It’s like a 9-1-1 call reporting “the house is on fire,” and urging us, in Peck’s concluding words, “to do everything in our power to stop it now, before it gets even worse.”

The American labor movement has been making that 9-1-1 call to the White House for several months now, and not getting through.  Unions in coalition with the Center for Community Change and the National Urban League are backing variations of “A Five-Point Plan to Stem the U.S. Jobs Crisis”.   The plan would create (or save) more than 4 million jobs.  Though it would add $400 billion to the federal government deficit this year, it would be paid for over the next 10 years by a small (1/2 of 1%) tax on stock trades and other financial instruments — a tax initially proposed more than a decade ago to discourage speculative investment of the sort that led to the financial meltdown in 2008.  In other words, the tax is probably a good idea anyway, would be paid only by investors, and it would allow job creation now to reduce the national debt in the long run. Economists from the AFL-CIO and its rival Change to Win met with White House economists to advocate for this program about the same time as Don Peck’s article appeared.  The response, I’m told, was “politely dismissive.”

As a Chicagoan who roots for our home-town heroes, I’ve been especially forgiving of Barack Obama.  Most of his critics seem to me to underestimate the level of difficulty Obama has faced given the character, severity, and timing of the Great Recession, the anti-functional rules of the U.S. Senate, the complexity of health care economics, and many other things.  But it is not difficult for a U.S. President to prioritize a house on fire over a crack in the foundation.  Part of the President’s job is to set the agenda for what gets public attention.  By establishing a bi-partisan commission to address the national debt while presenting a budget that basically says double-digit unemployment is acceptable for the next couple years, the President is making errors of both mind and heart.  It also seems like really dumb politics.   Pick up the phone, Barack, the house is on fire.

Jack Metzgar, Chicago Center for Working-Class Studies

This entry was posted in Contributors, Issues, Jack Metzgar, The Working Class and the Economy and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The House is on Fire

  1. Joe D. says:

    Yes, the house is indeed on fire. What’s missing, however, is a clarifying narrative (from the Left) on how the two national parties are responding (and have historically responded) to this type of crisis.

    The Democrats (however half-halfheartedly) would like to find a way to put the fire out, preferably without ruffling too many feathers of their recently solidified Wall Street donor base.

    The Republicans (past and present) are not only content to keep the house fire burning, but they want to steal the refrigerator in the process.


  2. Kathleen J. says:

    >> “Unions in coalition with the Center for Community Change and the National Urban League are backing variations of “A Five-Point Plan to Stem the U.S. Jobs Crisis”. The plan would create (or save) more than 4 million jobs.”

    It’s always interesting to see people proposing more government intervention, when it is such intervention that caused the current economic disaster. The five-point plan mentioned above contains only one free-market-based component, tax credits to stimulate job creation, while the other four steps involve the expansion of government. Yes, the house *is* on fire – and plans such as the one above will only accelerate the burn by pumping gasoline onto the conflagration.

    Government forcibly seizes money from productive earners, and uses it to fund its operations. Government employees are not productive – they do not produce anything, and the hours they spend working don’t improve the American standard of living; rather, they reduce it. Many government positions are not only non-productive, but are actually anti-productive. Legislators and tax collectors exist to leech every penny they can from the oblivious tax base. Would your quality of life improve if there were more IRS agents? More predatory police officers? More city workers painting fire hydrants? Or would that money be better used by you, who earned it?

    Stealing even more money from the productive earners, in the form of direct taxes or inflation of the money supply, and redistributing it to new, nonproductive government positions, as proposed in this plan, will simply drain even more private capital away from the many potential positive, productive uses it could have. And providing “fiscal relief” to state and local governments, when they were too incompetent and reckless to balance their own budgets, rewards their failure and invites them to incur even larger deficits in the future. Who needs to budget and plan for the future, when there’s always going to be a bailout?


  3. I tend to believe that recovery will never happen, and the dollar will continue to fall until the hyper-inflation kicks in. And then …LOOK OUT. Understanding exactly what is now going on takes time to understand some history that is not found in our indoctination system of non-education. (leave no child behind)
    Rather make sure that they stay ingnorant to the facts concerning the federal reserve system (FED) and how it was rolled into existing to transfer wealth to the elite and banksters who oh-by-the-way have funded both sides of every war since (at an interest rate of course). That and the fact that they also hold large amounts of the defense contracting companies, oil, chemical, and the list goes on here. Sound like a flim-flammy yet? It gets even worse.
    Fact is, that a lot of what we think we know…we don’t know. And until we take the time to learn the real history, we will never even stand a chance to undestand why we are where we are.
    Our “republic” has been bankrupt since 1933. Only twenty short years since the Federal Reserve Act was passed thru the house. And only then by use of trickery and bribes.
    We have been on the slippery slope towards socialism, or better termed as corporatism ever since. And real captalism has never even had an honest chance to take place because the FED has been in control, and setting the value of our money. Rather than congress coining money and setting the value as the constitution was meant to guarantee.
    We are all fighting the same enemy. That is what everyone must come to understand…sooner…or later, I hope that we all will.


  4. Bennett Steury says:

    In this analogy Dr C, it seems like labor and the anti-war movements are our volunteer firefighters; first on the scene with the tools, and the knowledge on how to put the fire out. Are we waiting for the call? What ARE we waiting for?


  5. Denise Narcisse says:

    The title of your commentary caught my attention, in part because one of my students in Introduction to Sociology shared the music video “We Didn’t Start the Fire'”by Billy Joel with the class recently.. (Students were to present a music video and then relate it to material covered in class). As I said to my student (s), their generation may not have STARTED the fire, but we ALL need to do our part to stop it so that we ALL are not consumed by it. Thanks for your blog. In keeping with my pop culture focus here, as in film The Matrix, picking up the phone is vital to OUR survival. So, yes Obama, pick up the phone!


  6. Dr. C. says:

    Jack, Your identification of “The House on Fire,” hits the mark, but off target with your gentle critique of Obama. What he needs is not yet another visit from labor leaders, but feel instead the rebounding kick from labor’s marching protest in D.C. and other major cities. To labor I say: Wake up! Form an alliance with the anti-war movement and let’s make history! Remove the blinders! Obama is just another corporate puppet…blinding us with his bogus hip intellect. Let’s not be fooled again (and again, and again, etc.)


  7. Pingback: Suburban Guerrilla » Blog Archive » A House On Fire

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s